Bottom-up sizing with the arithmetic shown, growth read from primary signals, and the why-now case argued both ways — no analyst-deck TAM theater.
Free & open · no signup · read-only — it ends by asking · nothing leaves your machine
You are working inside this repo — the research workspace for this venture. Mission: size this market from the bottom up — countable buyers × plausible price — and judge the timing: what changed that makes this possible or urgent now, and what says it is early or late.
Research pass: read the web and any reports at this root; your only write is the report file. Every factual claim carries a source link and access date.
Phase 2 sweeps the codebase through every one of these, citing file and line for each finding.
buyers reachable in the wedge segment, then the expansion rings; every input sourced, every multiplication written out
published market figures used only to bound the bottom-up, never to replace it; explain any large gap between the two
the countables over time: hiring trends, search-interest direction, community growth, funding flowing into the space
the enabling shifts, with dates: a capability that got cheap, a regulation that landed, a behavior that changed; what exactly was impossible or unnecessary three years ago
prior attempts and precisely which constraint killed them; verify that constraint is actually gone rather than merely older
is early advantage real here (compounding data, standards, land-grab) or is fast-follow the smarter seat
a thousand small checks or five big ones; the platform dependencies that could reprice the whole market overnight
One structured report at the repo root — or in reports/, if you keep one — the same shape every time, ready for a teammate — or the optional Studio — to act on.
Every Goal Prompt follows the same four steps, so results are consistent and repeatable — no matter which one you run.
Define the buyer unit precisely — a company of type X, a professional in role Y — and the annual-value hypothesis per…
Bottom-up count — buyers reachable in the wedge segment, then the expansion rings.
State the obtainable market for years one and two as a range, assumptions explicit.
Create MARKET.md at repo root.
Copy it and paste it into your agent inside the repo you want checked.
Install the goal plugin once — two commands — then just type /goal:market-size-timing.
/plugin marketplace add GhostlyGawd/goal-prompts/plugin install goal@goal-promptsOr install only this Goal Prompt as /goal-market-size-timing:
curl -fsSL https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/install | BRIEF=64 shLet an agent fetch it mid-conversation, or pull the raw Goal Prompt by URL.
https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/raw/64.mdNothing hidden — this is the whole Goal Prompt, verbatim. Read it in a minute, edit it, or copy it as-is.
# Goal: Market Size & Timing You are working inside this repo — the research workspace for this venture. Mission: size this market from the bottom up — countable buyers × plausible price — and judge the timing: what changed that makes this possible or urgent now, and what says it is early or late. Research pass: read the web and any reports at this root; your only write is the report file. Every factual claim carries a source link and access date. ## Phase 1 — Define the unit - Define the buyer unit precisely — a company of type X, a professional in role Y — and the annual-value hypothesis per unit. - Gather countable proxies: directories, associations, job-title counts, marketplace install counts, industry statistics — sources someone could actually enumerate. ## Phase 2 — Audit through 7 lenses 1. **Bottom-up count** — buyers reachable in the wedge segment, then the expansion rings; every input sourced, every multiplication written out 2. **Top-down sanity check** — published market figures used only to bound the bottom-up, never to replace it; explain any large gap between the two 3. **Growth reading** — the countables over time: hiring trends, search-interest direction, community growth, funding flowing into the space 4. **Why now** — the enabling shifts, with dates: a capability that got cheap, a regulation that landed, a behavior that changed; what exactly was impossible or unnecessary three years ago 5. **Why not before** — prior attempts and precisely which constraint killed them; verify that constraint is actually gone rather than merely older 6. **Window shape** — is early advantage real here (compounding data, standards, land-grab) or is fast-follow the smarter seat 7. **Concentration risk** — a thousand small checks or five big ones; the platform dependencies that could reprice the whole market overnight ## Phase 3 — Curate - State the obtainable market for years one and two as a range, assumptions explicit. - Write the bear case with the same rigor as the bull; this report exists to be wrong early and cheaply. ## Phase 4 — Report Create `MARKET.md` at repo root: 1. **The arithmetic** — the bottom-up model, every input sourced 2. **Growth and timing** — the why-now case and its strongest rebuttal, side by side 3. **The window** — the mover-advantage verdict with reasoning 4. **Sensitivity** — the single assumption that, if wrong, most changes the answer Start the report with today's date. If `MARKET.md` already exists from a previous run, read it first and lead with what changed since. ## Rules - Show every multiplication; a number without visible arithmetic is a vibe - Bull and bear get equal effort - No discernible product or idea to research in this repo? Say so in a one-paragraph null report and stop — a null result is a valid finding. - If a `reports/` directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root. - Before asking, present the top findings as a ranked list in plain words - Report only — end by asking whether size and timing justify the next brief
reports/ directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root.The candidate field. Turns your edges, interests, and constraints plus live market signals into 10-15 scored venture candidates — divergence before any deep dive.
One niche, fully mapped — the players, buyers, channels, watering holes, jargon, money flows, and unwritten rules — before you decide to enter it.
Proof people actually hurt — verbatim complaints mined from reviews and forums, search and hiring signals, and what they already pay to make the pain stop.
Everyone already fighting for this money — features, pricing, positioning, and traction compared, their customers' complaints mined, and the gaps nobody covers.
Runs inside these playbooks — curated sequences you can launch with one paste: