One niche, fully mapped — the players, buyers, channels, watering holes, jargon, money flows, and unwritten rules — before you decide to enter it.
Free & open · no signup · read-only — it ends by asking · nothing leaves your machine
Mission: Map the selected niche so later research targets the same buyers and buying process.
Read repo instructions, CHARTER.md and relevant notes/reports at root and in reports/. Charter constraints bound recommendations. In a conductor, read INDEX.md and venture-run.json for scope, criteria, decisions and input versions; otherwise record these in this report. Your only write is this report. No outreach, purchases or code changes.
Phase 2 sweeps the codebase through every one of these, citing file and line for each finding.
buyers versus users, budget owners, incumbents and substitutes.
who pays whom; price, billing unit, contract and margins from primary pages.
linked forums, communities, newsletters, associations and events; rank by observed activity and date.
jobs, terminology and beliefs supported by examples.
trigger, trial, approval, procurement and switching obstacles.
channels and gatekeepers; distinguish reachable audiences from theoretical headcount.
norms entrants must respect and hypotheses worth challenging.
dated funding, consolidation, regulation and platform shifts relevant to this buyer.
One structured report at the repo root — or in reports/, if you keep one — the same shape every time, ready for a teammate — or the optional Studio — to act on.
Every Goal Prompt follows the same four steps, so results are consistent and repeatable — no matter which one you run.
Fix one venture ID, buyer, pain, solution hypothesis and geography from explicit selection or reviewed OPPORTUNITIES.m…
People — buyers versus users, budget owners, incumbents and substitutes.
Distill three constraints entrants must respect and three promising observations, each with confidence and reason.
Create NICHE.md at repo root.
Copy it and paste it into your agent inside the repo you want checked.
Install the goal plugin once — two commands — then just type /goal:niche-map.
/plugin marketplace add GhostlyGawd/goal-prompts/plugin install goal@goal-promptsOr install only this Goal Prompt as /goal-niche-map:
curl -fsSL https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/install | BRIEF=61 shLet an agent fetch it mid-conversation, or pull the raw Goal Prompt by URL.
https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/raw/61.mdNothing hidden — this is the whole Goal Prompt, verbatim. Read it in a minute, edit it, or copy it as-is.
# Goal: Niche Map Mission: Map the selected niche so later research targets the same buyers and buying process. Read repo instructions, CHARTER.md and relevant notes/reports at root and in reports/. Charter constraints bound recommendations. In a conductor, read INDEX.md and venture-run.json for scope, criteria, decisions and input versions; otherwise record these in this report. Your only write is this report. No outreach, purchases or code changes. ## Phase 1 — Anchor - Fix one venture ID, buyer, pain, solution hypothesis and geography from explicit selection or reviewed OPPORTUNITIES.md. If several candidates remain, obtain selection or exercise recorded delegation before mapping. - Bound what is inside and adjacent-but-out. Check prior reports for conflicting scope or stale evidence; identify missing inputs rather than borrowing a different venture. ## Phase 2 — Investigate 1. **People** — buyers versus users, budget owners, incumbents and substitutes. 2. **Money** — who pays whom; price, billing unit, contract and margins from primary pages. 3. **Gathering places** — linked forums, communities, newsletters, associations and events; rank by observed activity and date. 4. **Language** — jobs, terminology and beliefs supported by examples. 5. **Buying process** — trigger, trial, approval, procurement and switching obstacles. 6. **Access** — channels and gatekeepers; distinguish reachable audiences from theoretical headcount. 7. **Practices** — norms entrants must respect and hypotheses worth challenging. 8. **Change** — dated funding, consolidation, regulation and platform shifts relevant to this buyer. ## Phase 3 — Decide - Distill three constraints entrants must respect and three promising observations, each with confidence and reason. - Identify what public sources cannot establish and the cheapest customer questions that resolve it. ## Phase 4 — Report Create `NICHE.md` at repo root: 1. **Map** — scope, cast, money flows and channels in tables. 2. **Directory** — gathering places, links, activity evidence and access constraints. 3. **Unwritten rules** — supported norms versus assumptions, with counterevidence. 4. **Next steps** — open questions, proposed interviews and success/stop criteria; no messages sent. Start with today's date. If `NICHE.md` already exists, read it first and lead with what changed; preserve prior work before an authorized replacement. Include scope, input versions, stable finding IDs, evidence, counterevidence and next steps; use the conductor's metadata when supplied. ## Rules - Separate direct evidence, proxies, inference and assumptions. Material factual claims need source links and access dates; date events too. Repeated citations are not independent evidence. Disclose inaccessible sources and shortfalls; never invent quotes or numbers. - Include meaningful counterevidence and what would change the recommendation. Stop at the agreed research budget; if none, state a bounded search plan and unresolved gaps. - If a `reports/` directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root. - Before asking, present the top findings as a ranked list in plain words. - No selected niche after resolving scope? Write a one-paragraph null report naming the missing selection and affected downstream work. - Report only — end by asking which unresolved niche question matters next; routine conductor continuation follows recorded authority.
reports/ directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root.The candidate field. Turns your edges, interests, and constraints plus live market signals into 10-15 scored venture candidates — divergence before any deep dive.
Proof people actually hurt — verbatim complaints mined from reviews and forums, search and hiring signals, and what they already pay to make the pain stop.
Everyone already fighting for this money — features, pricing, positioning, and traction compared, their customers' complaints mined, and the gaps nobody covers.
Bottom-up sizing with the arithmetic shown, growth read from primary signals, and the why-now case argued both ways — no analyst-deck TAM theater.
Runs inside these playbooks — curated sequences you can launch with one paste: