Home/Catalog/Venture
Venture — is it worth building?
Brief 61

Niche Map

One niche, fully mapped — the players, buyers, channels, watering holes, jargon, money flows, and unwritten rules — before you decide to enter it.

NICHE.md4 phases8 lenses~3.4k chars

Free & open · no signup · read-only — it ends by asking · nothing leaves your machine

What it does

Mission: Map the selected niche so later research targets the same buyers and buying process.

Read repo instructions, CHARTER.md and relevant notes/reports at root and in reports/. Charter constraints bound recommendations. In a conductor, read INDEX.md and venture-run.json for scope, criteria, decisions and input versions; otherwise record these in this report. Your only write is this report. No outreach, purchases or code changes.

What it looks for

8 lenses it looks through

Phase 2 sweeps the codebase through every one of these, citing file and line for each finding.

1

People

buyers versus users, budget owners, incumbents and substitutes.

2

Money

who pays whom; price, billing unit, contract and margins from primary pages.

3

Gathering places

linked forums, communities, newsletters, associations and events; rank by observed activity and date.

4

Language

jobs, terminology and beliefs supported by examples.

5

Buying process

trigger, trial, approval, procurement and switching obstacles.

6

Access

channels and gatekeepers; distinguish reachable audiences from theoretical headcount.

7

Practices

norms entrants must respect and hypotheses worth challenging.

8

Change

dated funding, consolidation, regulation and platform shifts relevant to this buyer.

The deliverable

What lands in your repo

One structured report at the repo root — or in reports/, if you keep one — the same shape every time, ready for a teammate — or the optional Studio — to act on.

NICHE.md
1
Map
scope, cast, money flows and channels in tables.
2
Directory
gathering places, links, activity evidence and access constraints.
3
Unwritten rules
supported norms versus assumptions, with counterevidence.
4
Next steps
open questions, proposed interviews and success/stop criteria; no messages sent.
One file. Evidence-backed. It ends by asking before touching anything.
How it works

What it makes the agent do

Every Goal Prompt follows the same four steps, so results are consistent and repeatable — no matter which one you run.

1
Phase 1

Anchor

Fix one venture ID, buyer, pain, solution hypothesis and geography from explicit selection or reviewed OPPORTUNITIES.m…

2
Phase 2

Investigate

People — buyers versus users, budget owners, incumbents and substitutes.

3
Phase 3

Decide

Distill three constraints entrants must respect and three promising observations, each with confidence and reason.

4
Phase 4

Report

Create NICHE.md at repo root.

Get started

Three ways to run this Goal Prompt

01 · COPY

Paste it in

Copy it and paste it into your agent inside the repo you want checked.

02 · INSTALL

As a slash command

Install the goal plugin once — two commands — then just type /goal:niche-map.

1/plugin marketplace add GhostlyGawd/goal-prompts
2/plugin install goal@goal-prompts

Or install only this Goal Prompt as /goal-niche-map:

curl -fsSL https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/install | BRIEF=61 sh
03 · AGENT

From an agent (MCP)

Let an agent fetch it mid-conversation, or pull the raw Goal Prompt by URL.

https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/raw/61.md
Transparency

The exact prompt

Nothing hidden — this is the whole Goal Prompt, verbatim. Read it in a minute, edit it, or copy it as-is.

Read the full brief (3,443 characters)
# Goal: Niche Map

Mission: Map the selected niche so later research targets the same buyers and buying process.

Read repo instructions, CHARTER.md and relevant notes/reports at root and in reports/. Charter constraints bound recommendations. In a conductor, read INDEX.md and venture-run.json for scope, criteria, decisions and input versions; otherwise record these in this report. Your only write is this report. No outreach, purchases or code changes.

## Phase 1 — Anchor
- Fix one venture ID, buyer, pain, solution hypothesis and geography from explicit selection or reviewed OPPORTUNITIES.md. If several candidates remain, obtain selection or exercise recorded delegation before mapping.
- Bound what is inside and adjacent-but-out. Check prior reports for conflicting scope or stale evidence; identify missing inputs rather than borrowing a different venture.

## Phase 2 — Investigate
1. **People** — buyers versus users, budget owners, incumbents and substitutes.
2. **Money** — who pays whom; price, billing unit, contract and margins from primary pages.
3. **Gathering places** — linked forums, communities, newsletters, associations and events; rank by observed activity and date.
4. **Language** — jobs, terminology and beliefs supported by examples.
5. **Buying process** — trigger, trial, approval, procurement and switching obstacles.
6. **Access** — channels and gatekeepers; distinguish reachable audiences from theoretical headcount.
7. **Practices** — norms entrants must respect and hypotheses worth challenging.
8. **Change** — dated funding, consolidation, regulation and platform shifts relevant to this buyer.

## Phase 3 — Decide
- Distill three constraints entrants must respect and three promising observations, each with confidence and reason.
- Identify what public sources cannot establish and the cheapest customer questions that resolve it.

## Phase 4 — Report
Create `NICHE.md` at repo root:
1. **Map** — scope, cast, money flows and channels in tables.
2. **Directory** — gathering places, links, activity evidence and access constraints.
3. **Unwritten rules** — supported norms versus assumptions, with counterevidence.
4. **Next steps** — open questions, proposed interviews and success/stop criteria; no messages sent.

Start with today's date. If `NICHE.md` already exists, read it first and lead with what changed; preserve prior work before an authorized replacement. Include scope, input versions, stable finding IDs, evidence, counterevidence and next steps; use the conductor's metadata when supplied.

## Rules
- Separate direct evidence, proxies, inference and assumptions. Material factual claims need source links and access dates; date events too. Repeated citations are not independent evidence. Disclose inaccessible sources and shortfalls; never invent quotes or numbers.
- Include meaningful counterevidence and what would change the recommendation. Stop at the agreed research budget; if none, state a bounded search plan and unresolved gaps.
- If a `reports/` directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root.
- Before asking, present the top findings as a ranked list in plain words.
- No selected niche after resolving scope? Write a one-paragraph null report naming the missing selection and affected downstream work.
- Report only — end by asking which unresolved niche question matters next; routine conductor continuation follows recorded authority.

House rules for this Goal Prompt

  • Separate direct evidence, proxies, inference and assumptions. Material factual claims need source links and access dates; date events too. Repeated citations are not independent evidence. Disclose inaccessible sources and shortfalls; never invent quotes or numbers.
  • Include meaningful counterevidence and what would change the recommendation. Stop at the agreed research budget; if none, state a bounded search plan and unresolved gaps.
  • If a reports/ directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root.
  • Before asking, present the top findings as a ranked list in plain words.
  • No selected niche after resolving scope? Write a one-paragraph null report naming the missing selection and affected downstream work.
  • Report only — end by asking which unresolved niche question matters next; routine conductor continuation follows recorded authority.
Keep exploring

More Venture briefs

Runs inside these playbooks — curated sequences you can launch with one paste: