What waiting on an agent feels like — progress honesty, interruptibility, showing the work, and salvaging partial results.
Free & open · no signup · read-only — it ends by asking · nothing leaves your machine
You are working inside this repo. Mission: walk the experience of using an agent-powered feature — kickoff, the wait, the result, the follow-up — and find where the interface hides, stalls, or strands the human.
Read-only pass. Your only write is the report file.
Phase 2 sweeps the codebase through every one of these, citing file and line for each finding.
a three-minute spinner vs visible steps; progress bars animating on a timer rather than reality
a cancel control exists, is findable, and actually stops the work and the spend — trace what cancel truly does
streaming, early partials, or a skeleton of what's coming vs all-or-nothing delivery
can the user see what the agent did — steps taken, sources used — or is it a verdict from a black box?
the run fails: is the message actionable, are partial results salvaged, is retry one tap or start-over?
does the interface teach what the agent can and can't do, or is it an empty box and a prayer?
agent-made changes previewable and reversible, or applied the instant the model speaks (see 43)
One structured report at the repo root — or in reports/, if you keep one — the same shape every time, ready for a teammate — or the optional Studio — to act on.
Every Goal Prompt follows the same four steps, so results are consistent and repeatable — no matter which one you run.
Trace the primary agent feature from the user's seat.
Progress honesty — a three-minute spinner vs visible steps.
Rank by felt time and felt risk on the most-used flow.
Create AGENT-UX.md at repo root.
Copy it and paste it into your agent inside the repo you want checked.
Install the goal plugin once — two commands — then just type /goal:agent-experience-audit.
/plugin marketplace add GhostlyGawd/goal-prompts/plugin install goal@goal-promptsOr install only this Goal Prompt as /goal-agent-experience-audit:
curl -fsSL https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/install | BRIEF=42 shLet an agent fetch it mid-conversation, or pull the raw Goal Prompt by URL.
https://goal-prompts.vercel.app/raw/42.mdNothing hidden — this is the whole Goal Prompt, verbatim. Read it in a minute, edit it, or copy it as-is.
# Goal: Agent Experience Audit You are working inside this repo. Mission: walk the experience of using an agent-powered feature — kickoff, the wait, the result, the follow-up — and find where the interface hides, stalls, or strands the human. Read-only pass. Your only write is the report file. ## Phase 1 — Walk the journey - Trace the primary agent feature from the user's seat: how a run starts, what the screen shows while it works, how results arrive, what happens next. - Inventory every UI state in code: idle, queued, running, streaming, partial, failed, done. Which exist? Which are the same spinner? - Measure or estimate the real wait times per state. ## Phase 2 — Audit through 7 lenses 1. **Progress honesty** — a three-minute spinner vs visible steps; progress bars animating on a timer rather than reality 2. **Interruptibility** — a cancel control exists, is findable, and actually stops the work and the spend — trace what cancel truly does 3. **Latency shaping** — streaming, early partials, or a skeleton of what's coming vs all-or-nothing delivery 4. **Show the work** — can the user see what the agent did — steps taken, sources used — or is it a verdict from a black box? 5. **Failure UX** — the run fails: is the message actionable, are partial results salvaged, is retry one tap or start-over? 6. **Input affordances** — does the interface teach what the agent can and can't do, or is it an empty box and a prayer? 7. **Review before commit** — agent-made changes previewable and reversible, or applied the instant the model speaks (see 43) ## Phase 3 — Curate - Rank by felt time and felt risk on the most-used flow - Every fix names its state and component; no vibes-level "improve loading" ## Phase 4 — Report Create `AGENT-UX.md` at repo root: 1. **Journey walkthrough** — state by state, with real timings 2. **The worst wait** — narrated as the user lives it 3. **Findings** — each: state · lens · fix · effort 4. **The first change** — usually visibility or streaming; spelled out Start the report with today's date. If `AGENT-UX.md` already exists from a previous run, read it first and lead with what changed since. ## Rules - Perceived speed is a design material; honesty about progress builds more trust than speed itself - Cancel must mean cancel — work, side effects, and billing - No AI features with a user surface in this repo? Say so in a one-paragraph null report and stop — a null result is a valid finding. - If a `reports/` directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root. - Before asking, present the top findings as a ranked list in plain words - Report only — end by asking which fixes to make
reports/ directory exists at the repo root, write the report there instead of the root.Approval gates audited for rubber-stamp fatigue and silent damage — who reviews what, when, with enough context to actually judge.
Confidence theater vs honest hedging — uncertainty channels, citation integrity, and what the product does after being wrong.